|
Longboard Reviews Rolls Rolls Longboards
|
Favored by 0 users
(Register to add this entry to your favorites)
Description
Company: Rolls RollsLength: 39.5"Width: 9"Wheelbase: 35"Static Flex:
Rock Solid - No Flex
Deck Specifics:
Drop Deck
Deck Shape:
Unique
Appropriate Discipline:
Cruising
E-Mail Address: smile@rollsrolls.comWebsite: http://rollsrolls.com/rollsrolls/sportster/sportster.htmlDeck Materials: Carbon
User reviews
Average user rating from: 2 user(s)
| Overall rating |
|
3.9 |
| Durability |
|
3.0 |
| Construction |
|
5.0 |
| Ride |
|
3.5 |
| Appearance |
|
5.0 |
| Stability |
|
4.0 |
| Agility |
|
3.0 |
To write a review please register or login.
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
Nice idea but..., Tuesday, 22 July 2008 Written by Rob Thomson - View all my reviews
| Overall rating |
|
3.2 |
| Durability |
|
2.0 |
| Construction |
|
5.0 |
| Ride |
|
2.0 |
| Appearance |
|
5.0 |
| Stability |
|
3.0 |
| Agility |
|
2.0 |
Longboard Review How long have you ridden the board: 8 months (7,500km/4,600 miles)What is your setup like?: Holey trucks, 97mm Flywheels 78aTypical Session Discipline: Ultra-long distance skateboard touringHow much did you pay?: 350 EuroWhere did you purchase it?: Rollsrolls GermanyWhat were the strengths of the deck.: Pushing platform: Low to the ground for efficient pushing.
Weight: Lightweight, making it an ease to push, even with big 97mm wheels.
Durability: The carbon/kevlar layer on the very bottom of the deck stands up to abrasion well, and protects the underlying full carbon layers well.What were the weaknesses?: Durability: I was touring on the deck across the US and Europe wearing a pack on my back with all my camping gear in it. Despite not being over the 100kg (220lbs) weight limit of the deck, the deck developed stress cracks within about 500km (310 miles) of my tour. The fractures did not cause a catastrophic failure of the deck, but were getting noticeably worse as time wore on.
Also, the deck needs to be treated like a carbon deck. Any small impact will scratch the surface, and the fenders in particular are very fragile. After a few months on the board, treating it like any other board, the fenders had long cracks in them.
Comfort: The stiffness of the carbon makes it, in my opinion, unsuitable for a long distance tour when varied road surfaces are expected. The board is only comfortable on very smooth surfaces. On anything else, vibrations from the road make for very sore ankles and feet, even with a foam grip surface on the deck.
Fun factor: The deck feels dead underfoot due to its stiffness and flat riding surface. The lack of concave makes for relatively unresponsive turning.Would you recommend it?:
No
Was this review helpful to you?
Report this review
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
INCREDIBLE!, Wednesday, 01 August 2007 Written by gribsrule - View all my reviews - Top 1000 Reviewer
| Overall rating |
|
4.7 |
| Durability |
|
4.0 |
| Construction |
|
5.0 |
| Ride |
|
5.0 |
| Appearance |
|
5.0 |
| Stability |
|
5.0 |
| Agility |
|
4.0 |
Longboard Review How long have you ridden the board: 3 weeksWhat is your setup like?: randall IIabec11 97mm, 78aTypical Session Discipline: cruising, carvering, slight downhillHow much did you pay?: too muchWhere did you purchase it?: mike allen, rolls rolls usa representativeWhat were the strengths of the deck.: can cruise forever. one push on this board my friends have to take like 3 to stick with me. deffinantly a head turner.What were the weaknesses?: low, 2 inches from ground even with spacers, wedges, and 97 mm wheels.Similar decks you have ridden?: none, one of a kindWould you recommend it?:
Yes
Was this review helpful to you?
Report this review
|
|
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 07 February 2007 )
|