Quantcast running cones in 1991for Guiness Book of World Records

Go Back   Silverfish Longboarding - The Longboard Skateboarding Community > General Longboard Discussion > 100% Skateboarding: Concrete Wave Magazine

100% Skateboarding: Concrete Wave Magazine Hosted by Michael Brooke.





Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-21-2007, 07:54 AM   #1 (permalink)
Publisher, Concrete Wave
Concrete Kahuna
 
skategeezer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,662
skategeezer is creating a great reputation.
Default running cones in 1991for Guiness Book of World Records

I think this could be broken

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/310497..._world_record/
__________________
Concretewavemagazine.com
click here to see back issues on line
http://www.silverfishlongboarding.co...409/Itemid,31/
skategeezer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links

Old 03-21-2007, 08:32 AM   #2 (permalink)
JBH
Addicted Cruiser
 
JBH's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: STL, MO
Posts: 639
JBH is on the right road.
Default Re: running cones in 1991for Guiness Book of World Records

Quote:
Originally Posted by skategeezer
I think it already has been--several times--unofficially, however, as far as Guinness is concerned. Then you've got the whole question of whether only clean runs count as records. Put it this way, though: I can think of a bunch of people right now who could run 100 cones clean in less than 20 seconds: Seyffarth, Dong, Kuzmins, Luca, Vlad, Richy, Barker, Maysey, Kowalski, Baumann, and so on. It'd be cool to see it officially sanctioned, though. What is it about this Sweeney clip that keeps it popping up every fortnight or so?
__________________
We either make ourselves happy or miserable. The amount of work is the same. - Carlos Castaneda
JBH is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 09:13 AM   #3 (permalink)
Order of the 'Fish
 
Directive0's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Inbound for 26, number 2 with traffic.
Age: 23
Posts: 9,380
Directive0 is on the right road.
Default Re: running cones in 1991for Guiness Book of World Records

Yah, I'm with JBH, I've seen this clip like 50 million times! DAMMIT MIKE!
Directive0 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 09:24 AM   #4 (permalink)
Concrete Kahuna
 
pavedwave's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: seattle
Posts: 2,689
pavedwave has tons of good stoke.pavedwave has tons of good stoke.pavedwave has tons of good stoke.
Default Re: running cones in 1991for Guiness Book of World Records

Quote:
Originally Posted by JBH
Then you've got the whole question of whether only clean runs count as records. Put it this way, though: I can think of a bunch of people right now who could run 100 cones clean in less than 20 seconds: Seyffarth, Dong, Kuzmins, Luca, Vlad, Richy, Barker, Maysey, Kowalski, Baumann, and so on.
I'm hoping we do this in Salem OR as we did a couple years back. Dong and Tay Hunt were fastest - Gareth was the only one consistently running clean. I think 100 cones clean is a must for the "record"

1st Michael Dong Fastest resultant time: 24.5736
2nd Tay Hunt Fastest raw time: 23.7439
3rd Gareth Roe 3 clean runs!

Last edited by pavedwave; 03-21-2007 at 09:17 PM.
pavedwave is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 09:48 AM   #5 (permalink)
Addicted Cruiser
 
stevie's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Los Angeles Harbor
Age: 48
Posts: 786
stevie is on the right road.
Default Re: running cones in 1991for Guiness Book of World Records

I think the course for the record should have a predetermined cone spacing. I also agree with a clean-only requirement.

My understanding is that the course on Sweeney's record run had 6'-0" spacing. The more recent record used a closer spacing, something like 5'-9" to 5'-6". At 5'-6", the course would be 50'-0" shorter than at 6'-0".

I recall a discussion at slalomskateboarder.com where some concluded that the course could have any spacing and any number of hit cones. Somehow I just don't buy that. What's the point? Why not just make the course 2'-0" spacing then and run it on roller blades?

I'd like to see more comments from those who agree or disagree.
stevie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 10:12 AM   #6 (permalink)
Concrete Kahuna
 
bucksaw87's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: buying used stuff off of SF, so i can look "gnar" with my pre-thrashed gear
Age: 21
Posts: 4,385
bucksaw87 has a spectacular reputation.bucksaw87 has a spectacular reputation.bucksaw87 has a spectacular reputation.bucksaw87 has a spectacular reputation.bucksaw87 has a spectacular reputation.bucksaw87 has a spectacular reputation.
Default Re: running cones in 1991for Guiness Book of World Records

i don't know much (anything really) about slaloming, but that video was nuts!
__________________
THIS SITE MAKES ME LOL
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krustyone View Post
Awesome, I've been quoted!
bucksaw87 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 10:52 AM   #7 (permalink)
Concrete Kahuna
 
Roodog's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NYC (Washington Heights)
Age: 35
Posts: 2,134
Roodog is on the right road.
Default Re: running cones in 1991for Guiness Book of World Records

Y'all think the hair helped him pump?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlashBoard
I chek my nuts almost neurotically now.
Roodog is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 12:22 PM   #8 (permalink)
Concrete Kahuna
 
pavedwave's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: seattle
Posts: 2,689
pavedwave has tons of good stoke.pavedwave has tons of good stoke.pavedwave has tons of good stoke.
Default Re: running cones in 1991for Guiness Book of World Records

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevie
I recall a discussion at slalomskateboarder.com where some concluded that the course could have any spacing and any number of hit cones. Somehow I just don't buy that. What's the point? Why not just make the course 2'-0" spacing then and run it on roller blades?
Set up 100 cones with no spacing and plow all of them on a speedboard on the steepest hill you can find. That reduces the start to finish to 43.75 feet. And the extra hair would no longer be a pumping advantage, but rather create drag.
pavedwave is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 01:13 PM   #9 (permalink)
Addicted Cruiser
 
stevie's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Los Angeles Harbor
Age: 48
Posts: 786
stevie is on the right road.
Default Re: running cones in 1991for Guiness Book of World Records

Quote:
Originally Posted by pavedwave
Set up 100 cones with no spacing and plow all of them on a speedboard on the steepest hill you can find. That reduces the start to finish to 43.75 feet. And the extra hair would no longer be a pumping advantage, but rather create drag.
I'm putting a tiny cow catcher on the nose of my speedboard right now. I'm even wondering if we could just stack the 100 cones and hit them all in one shot.
stevie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply





Thread Tools
colspan="2">
Display Modes