I love your argument strategy. Call it leverage, call it what you want, but based on the accepted meaning of leverage as a scientific term, it's pretty misleading in this case. Yeah, leverage comes into play, but not in the way most people think ("narrower trucks turn more cuz you have more leverage on your bushings").
Truth. I want to make it very clear that I fully accept the differences between wide and narrow trucks... that point has led to some strife in the past.
Also truth, and thank you for putting this in layman's terms.With regards to the last part, I think it's a matter of the angles between the center of mass and the outer wheels' contact with the ground. Same reason why lower riding platforms tend to drift more. As that angle increases (closer to vertical line between those points), the centripetal force on the board is more rotational (rather than lateral,) and vice-versa. More lateral force = more drift.
If the above is somewhat correct, maybe this is why you tend to see more square-profile wheels on topmounts as compared to lower decks... really making use of that rotational force in deforming the outer lip, adding to grip. (that last part could be complete BS, I don't have enough personal experience in racing to give a truly informed theory)
EDIT: kraffft beat me to it
|
Results 21 to 23 of 23
Thread: Hanger/Axel Width?
|



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks










Reply With Quote
Bookmarks