130's vs. 155's

[aStrauss]

I'm getting one of those super cool silverfish edition loaded fish decks. I am going to run seismic trucks on it when I can afford them. Should I go with 130's or 155's?

Also: Any ideas on springs? (I weigh around 130)





My bad, posted in wrong section. Answer anyway, though. Thanks

[rp1313]

get randal or paris 150's

[SeismicDan]

Originally Posted by aStrauss

I'm getting one of those super cool silverfish edition loaded fish decks. I am going to run seismic trucks on it when I can afford them. Should I go with 130's or 155's?

Also: Any ideas on springs? (I weigh around 130)...

I'm not sure how wide that deck is, but probably the Seismic 155s would be a better fit. Use the 30-degree model at the tail and the 45-degree model at the nose. At your bodyweight, the stock springs will give you a "medium" feel.

[ridesnow.]

you will have to redrill for the seismics, and i believe it makes the board flexier. If i were you, i would stay away from them, and get some tracker 139's or 149's...

[xxguitarist]

Enlighten us, ridesnow, why would one have to redrill a deck for trucks which have both newschool and oldschool mounting holes?

[ridesnow.]

Originally Posted by xxguitarist

Enlighten us, ridesnow, why would one have to redrill a deck for trucks which have both newschool and oldschool mounting holes?

huh, i thought seismics were only old school drilled. whoops. Disregard my previous post.... Sorry fellas

[aStrauss]

The stock set up has tracker 139's. I want to go with something different, more exciting. Otherwise I would go paris.

Any more advice?

[xxguitarist]

bennett/rts.