Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Thrasher speedboard article

  1. #1
    Addicted Cruiser rwadley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    305
    Rep Power
    6

    Default Thrasher speedboard article

    Is anyone willing to scan the September 1983 Thrasher speedboard article written by Bob DeNike? I have the article, but cannot scan it. It is outdated for the most part, but it gives an idea of how far speedboarding has come in the last twenty something years.



  2. #2
    JBH
    JBH is offline
    Addicted Cruiser JBH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    STL, MO
    Posts
    1,131
    Rep Power
    89

    Default Re: Thrasher speedboard article

    Quote Originally Posted by rwadley
    Is anyone willing to scan the September 1983 Thrasher speedboard article written by Bob DeNike? I have the article, but cannot scan it. It is outdated for the most part, but it gives an idea of how far speedboarding has come in the last twenty something years.
    Here you go, RW.
    I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer. - Douglas Adams

  3. #3
    Addicted Cruiser rwadley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    305
    Rep Power
    6

    Default Re: Thrasher speedboard article

    thank you so very much. you made my day.

  4. #4
    Addicted Cruiser wizzle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    281
    Rep Power
    9

    Default Re: Thrasher speedboard article

    awesome, thanks.
    VANCOUVER ISLAND, BC, CANADA

  5. #5
    Addicted Cruiser SpookTheHamster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Hampshire, England
    Posts
    761
    Rep Power
    8

    Default Re: Thrasher speedboard article

    Wow, it's funny reading all the recommendations. <160mm trucks, 30" boards, those guys are insane.

  6. #6
    Concrete Kahuna Slim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Pacifica, CA
    Age
    44
    Posts
    1,697
    Rep Power
    9

    Default Re: Thrasher speedboard article

    Quote Originally Posted by SpookTheHamster
    Wow, it's funny reading all the recommendations. <160mm trucks, 30" boards, those guys are insane.
    Well, back then the downhill boards may have been like 30" but the trucks were mounted almost all the way to the ends so you'd still have like at least a 22" or 23" wheelbase. Kind of like a lot of giant slalom boards now days I guess. Of course I'm not saying I'd choose my 33" with 22" wheelbase pocketpistol as a serious downhilll racing board but I'd probably survive moderate speeds ok if I set it up right (tightened the trucks a bit, ha!)

    As for trucks, aren't the Randal DH 160mm?
    Pacifica, CA
    "the pen is weak. skateboarding is as deadly as all hell" - gonz

  7. #7
    Addicted Cruiser tsmith25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Tampa FL
    Age
    27
    Posts
    894
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Thrasher speedboard article

    whats cool to me is that style wedging is still really common today. its how my board is. and many people run the dh rear base with r2 front which is similar.
    I\'ll go first...

  8. #8
    JBH
    JBH is offline
    Addicted Cruiser JBH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    STL, MO
    Posts
    1,131
    Rep Power
    89

    Default Re: Thrasher speedboard article

    Quote Originally Posted by Slim
    Well, back then the downhill boards may have been like 30" but the trucks were mounted almost all the way to the ends so you'd still have like at least a 22" or 23" wheelbase. Kind of like a lot of giant slalom boards now days I guess. Of course I'm not saying I'd choose my 33" with 22" wheelbase pocketpistol as a serious downhilll racing board but I'd probably survive moderate speeds ok if I set it up right (tightened the trucks a bit, ha!)
    Another thing is that many of the races back then seem to have been relatively short, almost sprints, in the neighborhood of maybe 20-40 second times. Capitola Classic and Laguna Seca come to mind. (Slim, did you ever go to Capitola back when they had those races there?) So having a relatively short, lightweight board probably helped a lot to get off the line quickly. John Hutson, the winningest downhiller ever, also rode pretty short boards, even at Signal Hill. He was known as a killer drafter and tactician, but I also seem to recall him saying that he liked a short, lightweight board because it allowed him to get a fast start if he needed to.
    I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer. - Douglas Adams

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •