Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 47

Thread: Insect Nano Firefly Prottype *Review*

  1. #21
    WOOF WOOF !!! Concrete Kahuna dozerdoggie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Central Florida
    Age
    46
    Posts
    2,274
    Rep Power
    162

    Default Re: Insect Nano Firefly Prottype *Review*

    Quote Originally Posted by Loki440 View Post
    if only i had the cash to buy some composite goodies and some nanotubes to play with (already have supplier) but alas no money
    make me a board alas money
    Quote Originally Posted by TehSuck View Post
    girls in leathers = hottttttttt.
    Quote Originally Posted by loadedfisherman View Post
    lol,your not realizing this is the fish...if k rimes ,mile high mark and bombsquad or anyone from tx says its good,then its good:lol:
    if its imported from another country then its automatically good.
    if dozer owns it and you cant find it anywhere then he bought them all and you will pay him a premium to get it.
    ec knows everything and blix can ban you.





  2. #22
    Cob
    Cob is offline
    Addicted Cruiser Cob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Stockholm Sweden
    Age
    27
    Posts
    713
    Rep Power
    21

    Default Re: Insect Nano Firefly Prottype *Review*

    Holy crap thats cool!
    Quote Originally Posted by BrickCityBombers View Post
    if it were a heard of hispanics, gaggle of greeks, a drove of danish or a swarm of swahili, i would have said so...
    .. sorry if it offended people.. damn
    You know you a longboarder if:

    Quote Originally Posted by sanitariumsuvivr View Post
    your last visit to the Emergency Room was from a dislocated shoulder that was the result of bailing on a peice of flatland when your scarf got caught in the front trucks and you choked yourself.............

  3. #23
    I Support The Fish
    Addicted Cruiser
    kenofseattle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,323
    Rep Power
    20

    Default Re: Insect Nano Firefly Prottype *Review*

    Quote Originally Posted by rivers View Post
    Exactly how many carbon nanotubes are in this deck then?
    Ok, I wasn't gonna, but now I think I will... I'm no scientist, and the people who engineer these things would laugh if they read this, but here's the basic principle.

    The name "nanotube" is derived from their size, since the diameter of a nanotube is in the order of 1 or 2 nanometers (approximately 1/50,000th of the width of a human hair). One nanometer is equal to a billionth of a meter. (One millionth of a millimeter). In other words, these are microscopically small things. There could be half a million of them on the end of a human hair and you wouldn't see or feel it.

    Nanotubes are "grown" in laboratories using arc-evaporation, and then "assembled" much like kids build little things with lego or erector sets, but on a microscopic scale. You don't pick them up with tweezers. You move them around by electrochemical means. And they tend to "clump" in a huge pile because of electrical attraction.

    And it gets worse. In order to adhere them to a sheet of carbon fiber, you have to attach infinitessimally small "connectors" to the top and bottom of each tube (!!). One connector is specifically shaped to bond with an adhesive, and the other connector is shaped to connect to the fabric. The tubes, when connected by top and bottom, then all follow the same axis in the matrix. They stand up crammed tightly together like people on a subway platform or outside the Apple store waiting for the new iPhone. One big mass of tubes standing on end connected to a sheet of CF that is pre-impregnated with resin.

    Next, the sheets containing the molecularly aligned nanotubes are pressed three or four at a time under extreme heat and pressure in molds with tolerances of less than a few microns. (You aren't gonna make a mold of this precision without a laboratory. They're made of high-tech materials and are polished for hundreds of hours before use). The pre-impregnated resin in the fabric liquifies at high temps and meld to the other sheets to become a contiguous landscape of diamond-hard black carbon about 1 or 2 mm thick. It is this material that we hammered with sledges to try and break and failed. Try that again. A 1mm thick sheet repelled the repeated savage blows of a 10 lb sledgehammer. Barely made a dent in the stuff.

    These pressed sheets of CFNT are applied top and bottom to the birch core with the strongest epoxy ever designed (only available to the military or highly specialized labs) and re-pressed with heat and extreme force again. Now you have a blank, with a wood core, which can be cut in the shape of a Mosquito, Firefly or whatever shape you need. It's an indestructable surface with enough rigidity at even 5/16 of an inch to support many thousands of pounds of downforce.

    And this skims over entire chapters of the manufacturing process so good luck working out the rest of equations and subsequent thermal process. It will be a few years before anyone gets close to this, and there are a few pesky patents in your way too, so if you want a skateboard made with it, Insect is the only source for the foreseeable future.


  4. #24
    Longskateaholic KenSeltzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pennsylvania and Delaware
    Age
    21
    Posts
    125
    Rep Power
    4

    Default Re: Insect Nano Firefly Prottype *Review*

    I want to get a Lighting Bug and a Mosquito not Nano though but my recent accident makes me just want to get a Nanotube mosquito
    "When all else fails , Longboard ."

  5. #25
    WOOF WOOF !!! Concrete Kahuna dozerdoggie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Central Florida
    Age
    46
    Posts
    2,274
    Rep Power
    162

    Default Re: Insect Nano Firefly Prottype *Review*

    Quote Originally Posted by kenofseattle View Post
    Ok, I wasn't gonna, but now I think I will... I'm no scientist, and the people who engineer these things would laugh if they read this, but here's the basic principle.

    The name "nanotube" is derived from their size, since the diameter of a nanotube is in the order of 1 or 2 nanometers (approximately 1/50,000th of the width of a human hair). One nanometer is equal to a billionth of a meter. (One millionth of a millimeter). In other words, these are microscopically small things. There could be half a million of them on the end of a human hair and you wouldn't see or feel it.

    Nanotubes are "grown" in laboratories using arc-evaporation, and then "assembled" much like kids build little things with lego or erector sets, but on a microscopic scale. You don't pick them up with tweezers. You move them around by electrochemical means. And they tend to "clump" in a huge pile because of electrical attraction.

    And it gets worse. In order to adhere them to a sheet of carbon fiber, you have to attach infinitessimally small "connectors" to the top and bottom of each tube (!!). One connector is specifically shaped to bond with an adhesive, and the other connector is shaped to connect to the fabric. The tubes, when connected by top and bottom, then all follow the same axis in the matrix. They stand up crammed tightly together like people on a subway platform or outside the Apple store waiting for the new iPhone. One big mass of tubes standing on end connected to a sheet of CF that is pre-impregnated with resin.

    Next, the sheets containing the molecularly aligned nanotubes are pressed three or four at a time under extreme heat and pressure in molds with tolerances of less than a few microns. (You aren't gonna make a mold of this precision without a laboratory. They're made of high-tech materials and are polished for hundreds of hours before use). The pre-impregnated resin in the fabric liquifies at high temps and meld to the other sheets to become a contiguous landscape of diamond-hard black carbon about 1 or 2 mm thick. It is this material that we hammered with sledges to try and break and failed. Try that again. A 1mm thick sheet repelled the repeated savage blows of a 10 lb sledgehammer. Barely made a dent in the stuff.

    These pressed sheets of CFNT are applied top and bottom to the birch core with the strongest epoxy ever designed (only available to the military or highly specialized labs) and re-pressed with heat and extreme force again. Now you have a blank, with a wood core, which can be cut in the shape of a Mosquito, Firefly or whatever shape you need. It's an indestructable surface with enough rigidity at even 5/16 of an inch to support many thousands of pounds of downforce.

    And this skims over entire chapters of the manufacturing process so good luck working out the rest of equations and subsequent thermal process. It will be a few years before anyone gets close to this, and there are a few pesky patents in your way too, so if you want a skateboard made with it, Insect is the only source for the foreseeable future.

    wow i just liked them because they look cool
    Quote Originally Posted by TehSuck View Post
    girls in leathers = hottttttttt.
    Quote Originally Posted by loadedfisherman View Post
    lol,your not realizing this is the fish...if k rimes ,mile high mark and bombsquad or anyone from tx says its good,then its good:lol:
    if its imported from another country then its automatically good.
    if dozer owns it and you cant find it anywhere then he bought them all and you will pay him a premium to get it.
    ec knows everything and blix can ban you.



  6. #26
    I Support The Fish
    Addicted Cruiser
    kenofseattle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,323
    Rep Power
    20

    Default Re: Insect Nano Firefly Prottype *Review*

    Quote Originally Posted by dozerdoggie View Post
    wow i just liked them because they look cool
    This is where I'm coming from. If you strip away all the technical baloney, you end up with a very, very lightweight longboard that's basically impossible to break and drives like a Ferarri. What else is there?

  7. #27
    Fresh Fish Rhyker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Age
    20
    Posts
    54
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Insect Nano Firefly Prottype *Review*

    why don't they just build a spaceship while there at it, geez.
    Quote Originally Posted by Reece Man View Post
    Manuel is a hispanic dude. A manual is a skate board trick.
    Quote Originally Posted by mc99david View Post
    steve: if you dont already know that answer than you dont deserve to know the answer... and i question your manhood

    m-m-m-mongo.

  8. #28
    Concrete Kahuna Alpha06's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    7,012
    Rep Power
    204

    Default Re: Insect Nano Firefly Prottype *Review*

    Spaceships are so last year.
    Killswitch Mini Drop Through 9/10 condition, $130+12 bucks shipping. PM ME


    Seismic Blastwaves: 38 bucks, 9/10 condition. Otang Stims, 28 bucks, 8/10 condition. PM ME


    Aerothrust/Speedmaster/Icaro 4-Fight/Vector M-4 Visors for Sale, 14 bucks PM ME

    Full Ceramic Bearings PM ME

  9. #29
    Addicted Cruiser luke.at.me's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    squampton
    Posts
    280
    Rep Power
    6

    Default Re: Insect Nano Firefly Prottype *Review*

    What price are we looking at here? I understand that this is a very pricey process, but I feel it will be hard to find a market for a board over ~400, especially with other options such as deelites and customs. Although this is a ground breaking technology I believe the cost to benefit ratio will be far to high for most people to consider.

    With that said I still totally want one, and if I had the cash to drop on a nanotube board I would.

  10. #30
    Concrete Kahuna skatardude10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Roanoke VA
    Age
    22
    Posts
    1,812
    Rep Power
    10

    Default Re: Insect Nano Firefly Prottype *Review*

    Quote Originally Posted by rivers View Post
    Toxicity

    Determining the toxicity of carbon nanotubes has been one of the most pressing questions in Nanotechnology. Unfortunately such research has only just begun and the data are still fragmentary and subject to criticisms. Preliminary results highlight the difficulties in evaluating the toxicity of this heterogeneous material. Parameters such as structure, size distribution, surface area, surface chemistry, surface charge, and agglomeration state as well as purity of the samples, have considerable impact on the reactivity of carbon nanotubes. However, available data clearly show that, under some conditions, nanotubes can cross the membrane barriers and suggests that if raw materials reach the organs they can induce harmful effects as inflammatory and fibrotic reactions.[32]

    A study led by Alexandra Porter from the University of Cambridge shows that CNTs can enter human cells and once inside accumulate in the cytoplasm and cause cell death.[33]

    Results of rodent studies collectively show that regardless of the process by which CNTs were synthesized and the types and amounts of metals they contained, CNTs were capable of producing inflammation, epithelioid granulomas (microscopic nodules), fibrosis, and biochemical/toxicological changes in the lungs. Comparative toxicity studies in which mice were given equal weights of test materials showed that SWCNTs were more toxic than quartz, which is considered a serious occupational health hazard if it is chronically inhaled. As a control ultrafine carbon black was shown to produce minimal lung responses.[34]

    The needle-like fibre shape of CNTs, similar to asbestos fibers, rises fears that widespread use of carbon nanotubes may lead to mesothelioma, cancer of the lining of the lungs caused by exposure to asbestos. A recently published pilot study supports this prediction. Scientists exposed the mesothelial lining of the body cavity of mice, as a surrogate for the mesothelial lining of the chest cavity, to long multiwalled carbon nanotubes and observed asbestos-like, length-dependent, pathogenic behavior which included inflammation and formation of lesions known as granulomas. Authors of the study conclude that

    "This is of considerable importance, because research and business communities continue to invest heavily in carbon nanotubes for a wide range of products under the assumption that they are no more hazardous than graphite. Our results suggest the need for further research and great caution before introducing such products into the market if long-term harm is to be avoided."[35]

    Although further research is required results presented to day clearly demonstrate that under certain conditions, especially involving chronic exposure, carbon nanotubes can pose serious risk to human health.

    After first seeing this thread and the word "nano" I was terrified at wondering if people really think this stuff is super amazing. Sure, it may do some cool stuff physics wise, but in terms of health consequences... we are just now finding out that cell phones are worse than cigarettes and give you brain tumors like crazy. Nanotechnology has certainly come a long way much beyond making it in skateboards and is already implemented in unimaginable ways all around us in our lives, so I don't know just how bad using it in a skateboard would be...

    But people need to be aware that this stuff is not harmless and nano sized particles easily lodge themselves inside cells, mess with dna, pass through membranes, cause all sorts of problems, and we don't know the extent of it yet, we just know it's not looking good. I would be weary of using carbon nanotubes at all... wearing a mask wont do crap at the nano level, who knows for sure about higher quality respirators. If you want to know more about possible areas of nanotechnology implementation shoot me a PM and I will be glad to share to whatever extent you are comfortable with hearing.

    It's some pretty diabolical stuff for the most part. But like any technology it can be used for good, and for bad... We just dont have the knowledge or the techniques developed yet to protect against it because again, we dont know the full extent of the damage this stuff will cause to us.

    I am very glad someone mentioned this. And like the other person said, this stuff is grown... and there are some wild things that can happen when things are set to grow. From my understanding they create them to grow according to artificial DNA... I dont know the extent of the material that is on this board, but there are technologies out there, DNA patterns that are set to repeat the growth pattern...

    There's alot to think about. We are messing with the building blocks of life here... and it's just starting to go mainstream on a wide scale... once again, there is a lot to think about... I certainly wont be getting a nano-board for quite a while... Then again, It's all there, its all gonna happen whatever happens, so what the hell. You can't hide from a nano.
    Last edited by skatardude10; 09-24-2008 at 05:17 PM.

  11. #31
    Concrete Kahuna tomahawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Berkeley
    Age
    26
    Posts
    2,734
    Rep Power
    78

    Default Re: Insect Nano Firefly Prottype *Review*

    yeah...nothing will happen.

    the nanotubes are in an epoxy resin. this means they will not leave easily. that means even if you sand it, you'll get large (larger than nano-scale) dust of epoxy resin+nanotubes. that might not be good for you, but you won't get the same health concerns as with nanotubes by themselves.

    the only way i could see this being a health risk is if you take the time to sand, grind and re-sand for 50 times until you get a ridic fine powder. then you deserve to die.

    cmon peoples, stop mindlessly reposting. THINK before you post. everything in the world is dangerous, just depends on two main factors: how much (over a certain timespan), and what size.
    vive le freeride!!

    Rayne!

    skatingfast.blogspot.com

  12. #32
    Order of the 'Fish Crappysurfer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    somewhere in the universe...
    Age
    22
    Posts
    8,747
    Rep Power
    117

    Default Re: Insect Nano Firefly Prottype *Review*

    well said dane

  13. #33
    Concrete Kahuna wilder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Kirkland, Washington
    Age
    26
    Posts
    2,015
    Rep Power
    12

    Default Re: Insect Nano Firefly Prottype *Review*

    Yes, like I said before its pre preg. Nano's already put into the pre preg sheets in a super controlled lab enviroment. On top of that the blanks are pressed in a highly controlled enviroment in whats basically a huge auto clave.

    Oh, and about the price. The target price for the speed boards will be around 450 bucks and its pretty likely thats what they'll be. Less for the carving boards and also depends on the flex you want. So more than a Dee Lite Avenger, and less than a carbon/foam Evo.

    Something I've talked about with Steve thats very interesting is just how simple this board is. And I think people will have a hard time understanding why they should pay more for a board thats only 3 main ingredients, than a board with over 10! But in my mind, simpler is better and a wood core is super resilient, especially when protected by CFNT. Yes the wieght can get lower and that would be rad! But an 8 pound complete board is damn light.

    And lets not argue over why you would need a CFNT board. Of course you dont need one. You can go just as fast and skate the same hills on a 2X6 if you got the skills. But people like nice things, and this stuff will last a looooooooooooong time.

    Now someone make some sweet titanium trucks to finish this bad boy off.

  14. #34
    I Support The Fish
    Addicted Cruiser
    kenofseattle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,323
    Rep Power
    20

    Default Re: Insect Nano Firefly Prottype *Review*

    Quote Originally Posted by tomahawk View Post
    yeah...nothing will happen.

    the nanotubes are in an epoxy resin. this means they will not leave easily. that means even if you sand it, you'll get large (larger than nano-scale) dust of epoxy resin+nanotubes. that might not be good for you, but you won't get the same health concerns as with nanotubes by themselves.
    Thank you thank you thank you. You've obviously cracked a few books in your day.

  15. #35
    Longskateaholic KenSeltzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pennsylvania and Delaware
    Age
    21
    Posts
    125
    Rep Power
    4

    Default Re: Insect Nano Firefly Prottype *Review*

    I have Insects Skateboards as my Homepage . I am so excited for this !
    "When all else fails , Longboard ."

  16. #36
    Addicted Cruiser ConnorH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Lake Forest Park, Washington
    Posts
    1,123
    Rep Power
    10

    Default Re: Insect Nano Firefly Prottype *Review*

    I watched a bill nye science movie today about nanotubes. Now I know:

    Skate.

  17. #37
    Addicted Cruiser jedininja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    NOVA (northern va)
    Age
    20
    Posts
    289
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Insect Nano Firefly Prottype *Review*

    Now someone make some sweet titanium trucks to finish this bad boy off.[/QUOTE]

    I think Radical actually made trucks out of titanium, but they cracked easier than 1066alum.
    I think....
    Point taken though.

    1MM CFNT> 10lb sledge?! Why don't we have an armor suit or something.
    never mind, they probably do. Right along with cloaking suits.
    Why can't I be a government scientist? Oh right..
    "With leathers you may get bruises, broken bones.....But no Owchies"

  18. #38
    Concrete Kahuna wilder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Kirkland, Washington
    Age
    26
    Posts
    2,015
    Rep Power
    12

    Default Re: Insect Nano Firefly Prottype *Review*

    Rode it in the rain last night and was again thoroughly impressed. The board is way more responsive than the birch/glass Firefly I have and I cant quite put my finger on why. I think it has to do with the slight flex. When skating the board shows no signs of flexing and feels solid as a rock. Its only when standing still and bouncing on do you notice the slight flex.

  19. #39
    Addicted Cruiser jedininja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    NOVA (northern va)
    Age
    20
    Posts
    289
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Insect Nano Firefly Prottype *Review*

    maybe if you skate with a CNT board it will infect the bloodstream, creating a super-powered longboarder with a boardy-sense!!!!
    "With leathers you may get bruises, broken bones.....But no Owchies"

  20. #40
    Addicted Cruiser *Gnar_Dog*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Bremerton, WA
    Posts
    610
    Rep Power
    7

    Default Re: Insect Nano Firefly Prottype *Review*

    I only know a very basic knowledge of how these nanotubes make the skateboard better, but I have been riding skateboards for almost 13 years and I can tell you that this board feels so good underfoot, and it's alot lighter, so when you're hiking your local spots and hills, it feels like nothing. Super stiff, super responsive and once I get my hands on a deeper concave deck, you know I'm gonna be riding everything with that board.

    I love the CFNT Firefly. Hands down best speedboard I've ever ridden. No joke.
    Insect Skateboards Downhill Team
    Northwest Longboarding Member
    The mountains shall bring peace to the people...

    [Derv] 12:23 pm: i would stick it in smurfs ass for a billion dollars

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •