| |
242Likes
-
Re: official photography thread
 Originally Posted by KyW Sky Rider
one of my favorite pictures

I understand why, a great mood going on there. I`d try to recover those blown highlights in the waves and straighten the horizon though...
-
-
-
Addicted Cruiser
- Rep Power
- 5
Re: official photography thread
-
Re: official photography thread
 Originally Posted by V.B
penis!!!!!!
left coast
-
Re: official photography thread
How about this one? Taken with the wide angle in portrait. Give his lean a little more curve.
C
-
Addicted Cruiser
- Rep Power
- 5
Re: official photography thread
-
Addicted Cruiser
- Rep Power
- 5
Re: official photography thread
 Originally Posted by Wells
HDR generally makes me want to kill myself and others. That fake tilt-shift "make everything look like a miniature model" BS that was popular a while ago also makes me want to buy a gun, too. Also, pictures of bicycles, long exposure pictures of traffic at night, roadkill, blurry black and white with weak tones, and most pictures of people irritate me.
Shooting raw, on the other hand, rules if you know what you're doing with it. After-the-fact white balance correction is a lifesaver, and sharpening is the illy.
And selective color still sucks. Take a picture like this, where there's only one color in the composition: http://www.edwardburtynsky.com/WORKS..._MAN_17_05.jpg.
Why doesn't anyone like HDR?
-
Re: official photography thread
Last edited by Mystery Bob; 04-26-2008 at 02:56 PM.
later
-
-
Re: official photography thread
great 6 minute piece of time-lapse video of Istanbul
It took the videographer Gençten two and half years to complete this project! He shot 90,000 frames and only used 10% in the finished video. He spent 6 months just to get the sun and the moons orbits in the right place. Over a quarter of a million have already viewed this. It takes a minute to get the screen, doesn't start automatically, so hit the go button. Enjoy....
later
-
-
Re: official photography thread
It's like longboards: sure a sector 9 is good enough for most beginners; but when you really get good it'll start to hold you back. When you want to invest in something quality you go with an Earthwing or, in photography, an SLR.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soflafreerider
skate more, suck less.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodys Halfpipe
all it takes is speed and balls. go fast and get low, the rest will take care of itself.
-
Addicted Cruiser
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: official photography thread
-
-
Re: official photography thread
 Originally Posted by Wells
It's like longboards: sure a sector 9 is good enough for most beginners; but when you really get good it'll start to hold you back. When you want to invest in something quality you go with an Earthwing or, in photography, an SLR.
If you buy an expensive skateboard for your first board, it may well get beat up running into curbs, sliding down storm drains, etc. How long does it take to 'get really good'? I'm not convinced better construction will help you much the first year. After awhile you'll know which one you want to invest bigger buck$ getting. By the time a beginner who invests in an expensive SLR has mastered it (it doesn't happen overnight) there will be newer/better technology to be purchased. I believe the compact, lighter camera can be initially easier to master. What will they get the first year for an $800 larger investment?
later
-
Re: official photography thread
Got some good ones in your photostream VertigoJ. This one is neat:
later
-
Concrete Kahuna
- Rep Power
- 10
Re: official photography thread
 Originally Posted by Wells
It's like longboards: sure a sector 9 is good enough for most beginners; but when you really get good it'll start to hold you back. When you want to invest in something quality you go with an Earthwing or, in photography, an SLR.
Sector 9 makes great boards. What the ####?
Besides, the camera shouldn't matter. You or I should be able to take just as great pictures with a crappy 35mm as we can with our fancy schmaltzy dslrs. All we pay for is convenience.
You seem to have this misconception that a good camera will take good pictures. That's rediculous. A good car can't drive itself. Neither can a good camera take phenomenal shots. Ansel Adams himself said that the single most important component of a camera was the twelve inches behind it.
"the best wide angle lens? two steps backward and look for the ah-hah!"
I'm out for now...being in this thread makes my stomach churn and my insides grumble.
I'D RATHER LIVE ON MY FEET THAN DIE ON MY FEET
-
Re: official photography thread
-
Re: official photography thread
 Originally Posted by revelation2
I'm out for now...being in this thread makes my stomach churn and my insides grumble.
thing is, wells has already proved he can take a good picture. you just keep talking about your indigestion, all we've seen of you is the #### you're throwing up
Shaven Fish Member #00013. Wait, I've got to shave my balls? Huck it, I'll take one for the team
 Originally Posted by sectorh15
wow, excuse me.
ive made a complete fool of myself.
hawt dawg, I'm cool - I've got a quote in my sig!
-
Re: official photography thread
A hammer on its own doesn't drive in a nail; but it makes it much easier than using something else. A million-dollar paintbrush won't make you Van Gogh; but it'll make creating your masterpiece easier. It's nice to have the right tools for the job you want to do.
Edit: also, this "all we pay for is convenience" line is absolute BS. If all I cared about was convenience I'd be rocking the camera phone, not the full-size SLR. I want clear, sharp raw images that I can process and print 11x16.5; so I go for the DSLR.
Last edited by Wells; 04-29-2008 at 01:54 AM.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soflafreerider
skate more, suck less.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodys Halfpipe
all it takes is speed and balls. go fast and get low, the rest will take care of itself.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks