Quantcast

Newsflash

Not all skate shirts are black!   Check out the Silverfish Gear Page .  There are new men's, women's and kids' shirts!  (Some are even black.)

 

 We're using "spreadshirt", so you order straight from them.  Dig through the listings and you'll find some classic 'Fish designs, including shirts with art taken from member Ryan's art-pen drawings.  Have an idea for a shirt?  Send it in!
 
feed image
feed image
feed image
feed image
Front Page
Reviews written by MacRae

 Not the best carving board,  Thursday, 16 April 2009

Overall rating
3.0
Durability
4.0
Construction
4.0
Ride
2.0
Appearance
2.0
Stability
3.0
Agility
3.0
I got this hoping to make a step up from my old pinner, but wound up only riding it for a short while before going back to my junky old skyhook deck. I like to keep my trucks pretty lose and wheelbite was a huge problem even after adding more risers and tightening up beyond what I usually prefer. It was impossible to carve with the setup I had and the whole thing just felt very rigid and awkward.

Unless you want to stick to wheels under 70mm, don't even bother with this deck. I've got some spare Indy 169s, so I'm hoping to resurrect it as a dedicated sliding deck with some NoSkoolz or some other wheel it can actually handle, but that's about the only hope I have for it.
Longboard Review
How long have you ridden the board: Only rode it for about a month.
What is your setup like?: At the time, 72mm S9 wheels and some indy knockoffs.
Typical Session Discipline: Cruising, carving, sliding
How much did you pay?: $65
Where did you purchase it?: From Zorlac
What were the strengths of the deck.: Pretty sturdy deck with nice nose and tail kicks. Wide platform, lots of room. Might make a decent pure sliding board.
What were the weaknesses?: Concave is only really apparent at the edges of the (rather wide) deck, and even then it's barely noticeable. Major problem with wheelbite, can only handle smaller wheels.
Similar decks you have ridden?: None.
Would you recommend it?: Undecided


 Perfect for what I needed,  Monday, 20 October 2008

Overall rating
3.8
Durability
4.0
Construction
4.0
Ride
5.0
Appearance
5.0
Stability
3.0
Agility
2.0
I needed a sturdy board that could accomodate larger wheels for urban commuting and a little bit of downhill, and the UA was exactly what I was looking for. The deck I received looks a little different from the images on most sites, the nose and tail are less squared off and come to shallow points, but the biggest difference is that the tail seems a bit shorter than in the pictures. The tail is really the only major downside for me: it simply isn't long enough to have the leverage necessary to lift the front wheels off the ground, due to the deck's weight. It's a little sluggish when turning and goes into slides easier than the lighter board I had before, but it's actually pretty responsive when carving. I'm a big fan of this board, the fact that it's so low to the ground makes it feel like I'm hovering.
Longboard Review
How long have you ridden the board: Two weeks
What is your setup like?: Indy knockoffs, 72mm 75a Sector 9s, Red Bones, Khiro bitch bushings
Typical Session Discipline: Urban commuting, some downhill
How much did you pay?: $100
Where did you purchase it?: Extreme Outdoor Supply
What were the strengths of the deck.: Very sturdy and heavy, great cutout shape, concave is decent but not so deep that it's uncomfortable, incredibly easy to push thanks to the lowered deck.
What were the weaknesses?: Wide turning radius, low clearance can get hung up on steep transitions, alleged kicktail is completely useless.
Would you recommend it?: Yes


<< Start < Prev 1 Next > End >>
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Active Image
 

Search Articles

Our Sponsors

Polls

You have a Week To Live. You want to...